Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX -vs- Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
Related Processor
Compare Related Processor
Specs comparison between Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
General | ||
|---|---|---|
Image |  | |
Name | Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX |
Code Name?An internal name used by the manufacturer during the development of a processor architecture. It often indicates the generation or specific design of the processor. | Arrow Lake-U | Arrow Lake-U |
Series?The marketing name given to a specific family of processors within a brand's lineup, such as Intel Core i7 or AMD Ryzen 5. Series names help categorize processors based on performance and target market. | Intel Core Ultra Series 2 | Intel Core Ultra Series 2 |
Model Name?The marketing name given to a specific family of CPUs within a brand's lineup, such as 'Intel Ultra 5' or 'Intel Ultra 7'. Model names help categorize CPUs based on performance and target market. | Intel Core Ultra 9 | Intel Core Ultra 9 |
Instruction set?The set of commands that a processor understands and can execute. Different instruction sets support varying levels of performance and compatibility with software. | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Launch Date | 01/2025 | 01/2025 |
Vertical?The intended market segment or use case for the processor, such as desktop, laptop, server, or embedded systems. It indicates the processor's design and features tailored for specific applications. | Laptop | Laptop |
CPU | ||
|---|---|---|
Total No. of Core?The total number of physical processing units within the processor. More cores allow the processor to handle multiple tasks simultaneously, enhancing multitasking performance. | 24 | 24 |
No. of P-Cores?The number of Performance cores (P-cores) within the processor. P-cores are designed for high-performance tasks and demanding applications. | 8 | 8 |
P-core Base Frequency?The standard operating speed of the Performance cores (P-cores), measured in gigahertz (GHz). It indicates the P-cores' baseline performance level. | 2.7 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
P-Cores Boost Frequency?The maximum speed a P-core can reach under heavy load, measured in gigahertz (GHz). It represents the P-cores' peak performance capability. | 5.4 Ghz | 5.5 Ghz |
No. of Ecore?The number of Efficiency cores (E-cores) within the processor. E-cores are designed for power efficiency and handling background tasks. | 16 | 16 |
Ecore Base Frequency?The standard operating speed of the E-cores, measured in gigahertz (GHz). It indicates the E-cores' baseline performance level. | 2.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
ECores Boost Frequency?The maximum speed an E-core can reach under heavy load, measured in gigahertz (GHz). It represents the E-cores' peak performance capability. | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
No. of Threads?The number of virtual processing units a core can handle simultaneously. Threads enable a single core to process multiple instruction streams, enhancing efficiency. | 24 | 24 |
L1 Cache?The smallest and fastest cache memory level, located closest to the processor cores. It stores frequently accessed data for rapid retrieval. | 112 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
L2 Cache?A mid-level cache memory that provides a larger storage capacity than L1 cache. It stores data that is less frequently accessed than L1 but more frequently than L3. | 40 MB | 40 MB |
L3 Cache?The largest and slowest cache memory level shared by all processor cores. It stores data that is less frequently accessed than L2 but still needed for efficient operation. | 36 MB | 36 MB |
L1 Cache(E-core)?The L1 cache memory dedicated to the Efficiency cores (E-cores). It stores frequently accessed data for rapid retrieval by the E-cores. | 96 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 Cache(E-core)?The L2 cache memory dedicated to the Efficiency cores (E-cores). It provides a larger storage capacity than the E-cores' L1 cache. | 4 MB (per module) | 4 MB (per module) |
Multiplier?A factor that determines the processor's clock speed by multiplying the base clock frequency. It influences the overall operating speed of the processor. | 27x | 28x |
Unlocked Multiplier?Indicates that the processor's multiplier can be adjusted, allowing for overclocking to increase performance beyond the default specifications. | Yes | Yes |
Package | ||
|---|---|---|
Technology?The process used to create the processor, measured in nanometers (nm). Smaller manufacturing processes typically result in more efficient and powerful processors. | 3 nm | 3 nm |
Base Power Consumption?The typical power consumption of the processor under normal operating conditions, measured in Watts (W). It indicates the processor's energy efficiency. | 55 watt | 55 watt |
Max. Power Consumption?The maximum amount of power the processor can consume under heavy load, measured in Watts (W). It represents the processor's peak power usage. | 160 watt | 160 watt |
Socket?The physical interface on the motherboard where the processor is installed. The socket type determines compatibility between the processor and motherboard. | FCBGA2114 | FCBGA2114 |
Max. Temperature?The maximum safe operating temperature for the processor, measured in degrees Celsius (°C). Exceeding this temperature can lead to performance degradation or damage. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
IGPU | ||
|---|---|---|
IGPU Name?The specific name given to the integrated Graphics Processing Unit (IGPU) by the processor manufacturer. It identifies the IGPU's architecture and capabilities. | Intel Graphics | Intel Graphics |
Base Frequency?The standard operating speed of the IGPU, measured in megahertz (MHz). It indicates the IGPU's baseline graphics processing power. | 0.3 GHz | 0.3 GHz |
Boost Frequency?The maximum speed the IGPU can reach under heavy graphics load, measured in megahertz (MHz). It represents the IGPU's peak graphics performance. | 1.9 GHz | 2 GHz |
Shading Units?The number of processing units within the IGPU responsible for rendering graphics. More shading units generally result in better graphics performance. | 512 | 512 |
TMUs?Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) are processing units within the IGPU that apply textures to 3D surfaces. More TMUs improve the realism and detail of rendered graphics. | ||
ROPs?Render Output Units (ROPs) are processing units within the IGPU that handle the final stage of rendering, converting pixel data into an image. More ROPs improve the frame rate and image quality. | ||
Execution Units?The number of parallel processing cores within the IGPU. These units execute graphics instructions, and a higher number typically indicates better graphics performance. | 64 | 64 |
IGPU Perfomance?The overall graphics processing capability of the integrated GPU. This is measured by how well it can handle graphical tasks, such as video playback and light gaming. | 8 Tops | 8 Tops |
NPU | ||
|---|---|---|
NPU Name?The specific name given to the Neural Processing Unit (NPU) by the processor manufacturer. It identifies the NPU's architecture and AI processing capabilities. | Intel AI Boost | Intel AI Boost |
NPU TOPS?The processing power of the NPU, measured by how fast it can perform AI and machine learning operations. Higher NPU performance leads to faster AI-powered features. | 13 | 13 |
Display & Memory Support | ||
|---|---|---|
Memory Support?The types and speeds of RAM that the processor is compatible with. It specifies the maximum amount and speed of RAM that can be used with the processor. | Up to DDR5 6400 MT/s | Up to DDR5 6400 MT/s |
Max. Display Resolution Support?The highest resolution that the processor's integrated graphics or the processor in conjunction with a dedicated GPU can output to a display. It indicates the maximum visual fidelity the processor can support. | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Features | PCI Express, Intel Gaussian & Neural Accelerator 3.5, Intel Neural Processing Unit, Intel Volume Management Device, Intel Virtualization Technology, Intel APIC Virtualization | PCI Express, Intel Gaussian & Neural Accelerator 3.5, Intel Neural Processing Unit, Intel Volume Management Device, Intel Virtualization Technology, Intel APIC Virtualization |
Features | Intel | Intel |
Intel Ultra 9 HX: 275HX vs. 285HX – Mobile Power Showdown
Intel’s Arrow Lake-U lineup brings us the Ultra 9 HX series, with the 275HX and 285HX vying for dominance in the mobile performance arena. Both are designed for high-end laptops, targeting professionals and gamers who demand top-tier processing power.
Key Specifications and Similarities
Both processors share a foundation built on the 3nm Arrow Lake-U architecture, featuring 24 cores and x86 instruction sets. They both support DDR5-6400 memory, have a 160W maximum power draw, and utilize the FCBGA2114 socket. These processors both have the Intel AI Boost NPU with 13 TOPS of performance. Additionally, both support a maximum display resolution of 7680×4320 at 60Hz.
Clock Speed Differences
The primary distinction lies in their clock speeds:
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Base frequency: 2.7 GHz, Boost frequency: 5.4 GHz. Integrated Graphics boost frequency 1.9Ghz.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
Base frequency: 2.8 GHz, Boost frequency: 5.5 GHz. Integrated Graphics boost frequency 2.0Ghz.
This slight increase in clock speeds for the 285HX translates to a marginal performance advantage in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks.
Integrated Graphics
Both processors feature integrated Intel Graphics, with the 285HX having a slightly higher boost clock. However, given their target market, a dedicated GPU is expected in most systems.
Performance, Strengths, and Weaknesses
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Strengths:
- Excellent multi-core performance for demanding tasks.
- Robust feature set with DDR5 support and AI acceleration.
- Slightly lower potential cost compared to the 285HX.
Weaknesses:
- Marginally lower clock speeds compared to the 285HX.
- Slightly lower IGPU boost frequency.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
Strengths:
- Slightly higher clock speeds for improved performance.
- Marginally faster integrated graphics.
- Represents the top-tier mobile performance offering.
Weaknesses:
- Potentially higher cost.
- Minimal real-world performance difference in many scenarios.
Conclusion
The 285HX offers a slight performance edge due to its higher clock speeds. However, the 275HX remains a potent option. The decision between the two will likely depend on pricing and the user’s specific performance requirements. For those seeking absolute top-tier mobile performance, the 285HX is the clear choice. For most users, the 275HX will provide ample power. Given the performance target of these processors, a dedicated GPU is highly recommended for both.