AMD Ryzen Al Max+ PRO 395 -vs- Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

Related Processor

Compare Related Processor

Specs comparison between AMD Ryzen Al Max+ PRO 395 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

General specs comparisons between AMD Ryzen Al Max+ PRO 395 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

General

Image

AMD Ryzen ai Max Brand LogoIntel Series 2 Ultra 7 Logo

Name

AMD Ryzen Al Max+ PRO 395Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

Code Name

?An internal name used by the manufacturer during the development of a processor architecture. It often indicates the generation or specific design of the processor.
Zen 5 (Strix Halo)Arrow Lake-U

Series

?The marketing name given to a specific family of processors within a brand's lineup, such as Intel Core i7 or AMD Ryzen 5. Series names help categorize processors based on performance and target market.
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 300Intel Core Ultra Series 2

Model Name

?The marketing name given to a specific family of CPUs within a brand's lineup, such as 'Intel Ultra 5' or 'Intel Ultra 7'. Model names help categorize CPUs based on performance and target market.
AI Max+ 395Intel Core Ultra 7

Instruction set

?The set of commands that a processor understands and can execute. Different instruction sets support varying levels of performance and compatibility with software.
x86-6464-bit

Launch Date

01/202501/2025

Vertical

?The intended market segment or use case for the processor, such as desktop, laptop, server, or embedded systems. It indicates the processor's design and features tailored for specific applications.
LaptopLaptop
processors cpu comparisons between AMD Ryzen Al Max+ PRO 395 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

CPU

Total No. of Core

?The total number of physical processing units within the processor. More cores allow the processor to handle multiple tasks simultaneously, enhancing multitasking performance.
1612

No. of P-Cores

?The number of Performance cores (P-cores) within the processor. P-cores are designed for high-performance tasks and demanding applications.
162

P-core Base Frequency

?The standard operating speed of the Performance cores (P-cores), measured in gigahertz (GHz). It indicates the P-cores' baseline performance level.
3 GHz2.1 GHz

P-Cores Boost Frequency

?The maximum speed a P-core can reach under heavy load, measured in gigahertz (GHz). It represents the P-cores' peak performance capability.
5.1 Ghz5.3 Ghz

No. of Ecore

?The number of Efficiency cores (E-cores) within the processor. E-cores are designed for power efficiency and handling background tasks.
8

Ecore Base Frequency

?The standard operating speed of the E-cores, measured in gigahertz (GHz). It indicates the E-cores' baseline performance level.
1.7 GHz

ECores Boost Frequency

?The maximum speed an E-core can reach under heavy load, measured in gigahertz (GHz). It represents the E-cores' peak performance capability.
4.2 GHz

No of LE-Cores

?The number of Low Energy cores (LE-cores) within the processor. LE-cores are designed for very low power consumption and handling extremely light tasks.
2

LE-Cores Base Frequency

?The standard operating speed of the LE-cores, measured in gigahertz (GHz). It indicates the LE-cores' baseline performance level.
0.7 GHz

LE-Cores Boost Frequency

?The maximum speed an LE-core can reach under heavy load, measured in gigahertz (GHz). It represents the LE-cores' peak performance capability.
2.4 GHz

No. of Threads

?The number of virtual processing units a core can handle simultaneously. Threads enable a single core to process multiple instruction streams, enhancing efficiency.
3214

L1 Cache

?The smallest and fastest cache memory level, located closest to the processor cores. It stores frequently accessed data for rapid retrieval.
80KB (per core)112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

?A mid-level cache memory that provides a larger storage capacity than L1 cache. It stores data that is less frequently accessed than L1 but more frequently than L3.
16 MB2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

?The largest and slowest cache memory level shared by all processor cores. It stores data that is less frequently accessed than L2 but still needed for efficient operation.
64 MB12 MB

Multiplier

?A factor that determines the processor's clock speed by multiplying the base clock frequency. It influences the overall operating speed of the processor.
30x21x

Unlocked Multiplier

?Indicates that the processor's multiplier can be adjusted, allowing for overclocking to increase performance beyond the default specifications.
NoNo
manufacturing technology and tdp comparisons between AMD Ryzen Al Max+ PRO 395 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

Package

Technology

?The process used to create the processor, measured in nanometers (nm). Smaller manufacturing processes typically result in more efficient and powerful processors.
TSMC 4nm FinFET3 nm

Base Power Consumption

?The typical power consumption of the processor under normal operating conditions, measured in Watts (W). It indicates the processor's energy efficiency.
45 watt15 watt

Max. Power Consumption

?The maximum amount of power the processor can consume under heavy load, measured in Watts (W). It represents the processor's peak power usage.
120 watt57 watt

Socket

?The physical interface on the motherboard where the processor is installed. The socket type determines compatibility between the processor and motherboard.
FP11FCBGA2049

Max. Temperature

?The maximum safe operating temperature for the processor, measured in degrees Celsius (°C). Exceeding this temperature can lead to performance degradation or damage.
100°C110 °C
comparison of igpu between AMD Ryzen Al Max+ PRO 395 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

IGPU

IGPU Name

?The specific name given to the integrated Graphics Processing Unit (IGPU) by the processor manufacturer. It identifies the IGPU's architecture and capabilities.
Intel Graphics

Base Frequency

?The standard operating speed of the IGPU, measured in megahertz (MHz). It indicates the IGPU's baseline graphics processing power.
0.3 GHz

Boost Frequency

?The maximum speed the IGPU can reach under heavy graphics load, measured in megahertz (MHz). It represents the IGPU's peak graphics performance.
2900 MHz2.1 GHz

Shading Units

?The number of processing units within the IGPU responsible for rendering graphics. More shading units generally result in better graphics performance.
2560512

TMUs

?Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) are processing units within the IGPU that apply textures to 3D surfaces. More TMUs improve the realism and detail of rendered graphics.
160

ROPs

?Render Output Units (ROPs) are processing units within the IGPU that handle the final stage of rendering, converting pixel data into an image. More ROPs improve the frame rate and image quality.
80

Execution Units

?The number of parallel processing cores within the IGPU. These units execute graphics instructions, and a higher number typically indicates better graphics performance.
4064
npu comparison between AMD Ryzen Al Max+ PRO 395 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

NPU

NPU Name

?The specific name given to the Neural Processing Unit (NPU) by the processor manufacturer. It identifies the NPU's architecture and AI processing capabilities.
AMD Ryzen AIIntel AI Boost

NPU TOPS

?The processing power of the NPU, measured by how fast it can perform AI and machine learning operations. Higher NPU performance leads to faster AI-powered features.
50 TOPS12
display and memory comparison between AMD Ryzen Al Max+ PRO 395 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

Display & Memory Support

Memory Support

?The types and speeds of RAM that the processor is compatible with. It specifies the maximum amount and speed of RAM that can be used with the processor.
LPDDR5x-8000Up to LPDDR5/x 8400 MT/s
Up to DDR5 6400 MT/s

Max. Display Resolution Support

?The highest resolution that the processor's integrated graphics or the processor in conjunction with a dedicated GPU can output to a display. It indicates the maximum visual fidelity the processor can support.
7680x4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Features

PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4APCI Express, Intel Gaussian & Neural Accelerator 3.5, Intel Neural Processing Unit, Intel Volume Management Device, Intel Virtualization Technology, Intel APIC Virtualization

Features

AMDIntel

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs. Intel Core Ultra 7 265U: High-Performance vs. Efficiency in Mobile Computing

This comparison pits the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, a high-performance mobile processor with a strong emphasis on AI, against the Intel Core Ultra 7 265U, designed for efficiency and balanced performance. Both processors target the mobile market but cater to very different needs.

Key Specifications and Differences

These processors showcase a clear divergence in core counts, power consumption, and AI capabilities.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Specifications:
  • Architecture: Zen 5 (Strix Halo)
  • Cores: 16
  • Base Frequency: 3 GHz
  • Boost Frequency: 5.1 GHz
  • Manufacturing: TSMC 4nm FinFET
  • TDP: 45-120W
  • NPU: AMD Ryzen AI (50 TOPS)
  • Memory: LPDDR5x-8000
  • Socket: FP11
  • Max Temp: 100°C

Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

Specifications:
  • Architecture: Arrow Lake-U
  • Cores: 12
  • Base Frequency: 2.1 GHz
  • Boost Frequency: 5.3 GHz
  • Manufacturing: 3nm
  • TDP: 15-57W
  • iGPU: Intel Graphics (2.1 GHz, 512 Shaders)
  • NPU: Intel AI Boost (12 TOPS)
  • Memory: LPDDR5/x 8400 MT/s, DDR5 6400 MT/s
  • Socket: FCBGA2049
  • Max Temp: 110°C

Performance, Strengths, and Weaknesses

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Strengths:
  • Higher core count and base frequency for superior multi-threaded performance.
  • Strong AI capabilities with 50 TOPS NPU performance.
  • Support for high-speed LPDDR5x memory.
  • Designed for high-performance laptops.
Weaknesses:
  • Higher power consumption, potentially impacting battery life.
  • Lower boost frequency than the Intel 265U.
  • Lower maximum operating temperature.

Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

Strengths:
  • Lower power consumption, ideal for extended battery life.
  • Decent boost frequency for responsive performance.
  • Support for both LPDDR5/x and DDR5 memory.
  • Higher maximum operating temperature.
Weaknesses:
  • Lower core count and base frequency, limiting multi-threaded performance.
  • Significantly lower NPU performance.
  • Less powerful for demanding tasks.
  • Integrated graphics performance is less than a dedicated GPU.

Conclusion

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is tailored for high-performance mobile workstations and laptops, excelling in demanding tasks and AI-driven applications. Its higher core count and robust NPU make it a strong contender for content creators and professionals. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265U, on the other hand, prioritizes efficiency and battery life, making it suitable for everyday productivity and general-purpose use. It offers a balance of performance and power consumption, appealing to users who value portability. The choice between these processors depends on the user’s specific priorities. If raw performance and AI capabilities are paramount, the AMD 395 is the clear choice. If battery life and efficiency are more important, the Intel 265U is the better option.

Laptops with AMD Ryzen Al Max+ PRO 395 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265U

Cookie 'cookie_name' is not set.